<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1396 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760797</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant. It held that the services in question were admissible input services eligible for Cenvat credit, as they were used in or related to the manufacture of the final product and did not fall within the exclusion clause.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 08:31:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1396 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760797</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant. It held that the services in question were admissible input services eligible for Cenvat credit, as they were used in or related to the manufacture of the final product and did not fall within the exclusion clause.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>