https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760798 The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging a service tax recovery order dated 31.03.2017. The petitioner filed an appeal on 13.01.2021, exceeding the prescribed limitation period by 1325 days. The court held it lacked extraordinary jurisdiction to condone such excessive delay, citing Supreme Court precedents that established no power exists to condone delays beyond the 30-day statutory period under the Central Excise Act. The court noted the petitioner had an alternative remedy through appeal under section 35-G before the Division Bench, making the writ petition unmaintainable. en-us Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Oct 2024 13:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760798 The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging a service tax recovery order dated 31.03.2017. The petitioner filed an appeal on 13.01.2021, exceeding the prescribed limitation period by 1325 days. The court held it lacked extraordinary jurisdiction to condone such excessive delay, citing Supreme Court precedents that established no power exists to condone delays beyond the 30-day statutory period under the Central Excise Act. The court noted the petitioner had an alternative remedy through appeal under section 35-G before the Division Bench, making the writ petition unmaintainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760798