https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760799 The HC dismissed the appeal, holding there is no error in the CESTAT's orders rejecting rectification of the refund claim for unutilized credit. The court found the CESTAT correctly applied binding Full Bench precedent and that any factual differences did not take the case outside that ratio. Because the impugned orders were not error-prone, no substantial question of law arises, and the appellant's challenge to the rejection of rectification was rejected. en-us Wed, 23 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Oct 2025 14:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760799 The HC dismissed the appeal, holding there is no error in the CESTAT's orders rejecting rectification of the refund claim for unutilized credit. The court found the CESTAT correctly applied binding Full Bench precedent and that any factual differences did not take the case outside that ratio. Because the impugned orders were not error-prone, no substantial question of law arises, and the appellant's challenge to the rejection of rectification was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760799