<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1401 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760802</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order that confirmed service tax demands under CRCS for the period from January 2008 to June 2010. It concluded that service tax could not be imposed on construction of residential complexes before 01.07.2010, aligning with previous rulings and legal precedents. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, granting consequential benefits to the appellant as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1401 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760802</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order that confirmed service tax demands under CRCS for the period from January 2008 to June 2010. It concluded that service tax could not be imposed on construction of residential complexes before 01.07.2010, aligning with previous rulings and legal precedents. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, granting consequential benefits to the appellant as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>