<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1420 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760821</link>
    <description>The AAAR Rajasthan held that the margin scheme under Rule 32(5) of CGST Rules, 2017 is not limited to second-hand motor vehicles but applies to all qualifying second-hand goods. However, the appellant&#039;s goods including iron scrap, lead acid batteries, aluminum utensils, brass utensils, steel utensils, copper scrap, and plastic items were classified as scrap rather than second-hand goods. The authority distinguished between scrap requiring processing for reuse and second-hand goods ready for immediate use with continuity of usage. Since the appellant&#039;s goods failed to meet the second-hand goods criteria, they were ineligible for margin scheme benefits for both intra-state and inter-state supplies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1420 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760821</link>
      <description>The AAAR Rajasthan held that the margin scheme under Rule 32(5) of CGST Rules, 2017 is not limited to second-hand motor vehicles but applies to all qualifying second-hand goods. However, the appellant&#039;s goods including iron scrap, lead acid batteries, aluminum utensils, brass utensils, steel utensils, copper scrap, and plastic items were classified as scrap rather than second-hand goods. The authority distinguished between scrap requiring processing for reuse and second-hand goods ready for immediate use with continuity of usage. Since the appellant&#039;s goods failed to meet the second-hand goods criteria, they were ineligible for margin scheme benefits for both intra-state and inter-state supplies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>