<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1427 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760828</link>
    <description>The SC examined GST liability on mining-related fees. The court stayed GST recovery on royalty pending a Constitution Bench decision, directing the petitioner to submit objections within four weeks. The Division Bench referred to existing notifications and interim orders, ultimately disposing of the petition with procedural guidelines for further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1427 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760828</link>
      <description>The SC examined GST liability on mining-related fees. The court stayed GST recovery on royalty pending a Constitution Bench decision, directing the petitioner to submit objections within four weeks. The Division Bench referred to existing notifications and interim orders, ultimately disposing of the petition with procedural guidelines for further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>