<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1430 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760831</link>
    <description>HC ruled against the petitioner&#039;s GST exemption claim, finding insufficient evidence to substantiate the business nature and project details. The court upheld the assessment orders, directing the petitioner to pursue appeals before the appellate authority within 15 days. No interference was granted under Article 226, and the writ petitions were disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 19:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1430 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760831</link>
      <description>HC ruled against the petitioner&#039;s GST exemption claim, finding insufficient evidence to substantiate the business nature and project details. The court upheld the assessment orders, directing the petitioner to pursue appeals before the appellate authority within 15 days. No interference was granted under Article 226, and the writ petitions were disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>