<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1433 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760834</link>
    <description>HC Madras quashed an assessment order due to lack of personal hearing. The case was remanded for reconsideration, allowing the petitioner to file a reply within two weeks. The assessing officer must provide a hearing and issue a new assessment order within two months. ITC amounts will be addressed in remanded proceedings, and bank account attachment orders are lifted. Case disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 19:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1433 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760834</link>
      <description>HC Madras quashed an assessment order due to lack of personal hearing. The case was remanded for reconsideration, allowing the petitioner to file a reply within two weeks. The assessing officer must provide a hearing and issue a new assessment order within two months. ITC amounts will be addressed in remanded proceedings, and bank account attachment orders are lifted. Case disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>