<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (1) TMI 20 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39039</link>
    <description>Land used for growing sugarcane remained within the agricultural income-tax net because conversion permission for non-agricultural use did not, by itself, alter the land&#039;s tax character. The Karnataka High Court applied the charging provision in the Karnataka Agricultural Income-tax Act and the constitutional and statutory concept of agricultural income, which require agricultural use and a relevant liability to land revenue or local rate. As the land continued to be used for cultivation and no material showed that it had become revenue-free in fact and in law, the exclusion argument failed and the revision petitions were liable to fail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:33:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (1) TMI 20 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39039</link>
      <description>Land used for growing sugarcane remained within the agricultural income-tax net because conversion permission for non-agricultural use did not, by itself, alter the land&#039;s tax character. The Karnataka High Court applied the charging provision in the Karnataka Agricultural Income-tax Act and the constitutional and statutory concept of agricultural income, which require agricultural use and a relevant liability to land revenue or local rate. As the land continued to be used for cultivation and no material showed that it had become revenue-free in fact and in law, the exclusion argument failed and the revision petitions were liable to fail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>