https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760845 GST intimation matters concerning royalty were kept aligned with the Division Bench directions in A. Venkatachalam: the petitioner was permitted to file objections or a reply within four weeks from receipt of the order, and the petitions were disposed of on those terms. Adjudication was kept in abeyance pending the decision of the Nine Judge Constitution Bench, and no recovery of GST on royalty is to be made until that decision is delivered. The petitioner was also left free to pursue further remedies as provided in the Division Bench judgment. en-us Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 18:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760845 GST intimation matters concerning royalty were kept aligned with the Division Bench directions in A. Venkatachalam: the petitioner was permitted to file objections or a reply within four weeks from receipt of the order, and the petitions were disposed of on those terms. Adjudication was kept in abeyance pending the decision of the Nine Judge Constitution Bench, and no recovery of GST on royalty is to be made until that decision is delivered. The petitioner was also left free to pursue further remedies as provided in the Division Bench judgment. Case-Laws GST Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760845