<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1445 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760846</link>
    <description>An appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 challenging a question of taxability was not maintainable before the High Court. Following its earlier rulings, the Bench reiterated that disputes on taxability lie to the Supreme Court and not to the High Court under this provision. The appeal was dismissed for want of maintainability, with liberty to pursue the appropriate remedy in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 17:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1445 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760846</link>
      <description>An appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 challenging a question of taxability was not maintainable before the High Court. Following its earlier rulings, the Bench reiterated that disputes on taxability lie to the Supreme Court and not to the High Court under this provision. The appeal was dismissed for want of maintainability, with liberty to pursue the appropriate remedy in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>