<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1526 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458438</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appeal against the ITAT&#039;s order concerning the Assessment Year 2007-08. It affirmed that the CIT&#039;s directive to disallow expenditure under Section 40(a)(ia) exceeded the jurisdiction under Section 263. The ITAT&#039;s decision to annul the CIT&#039;s order for re-examination by the AO was upheld, with no substantial legal question identified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 19:28:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1526 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458438</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appeal against the ITAT&#039;s order concerning the Assessment Year 2007-08. It affirmed that the CIT&#039;s directive to disallow expenditure under Section 40(a)(ia) exceeded the jurisdiction under Section 263. The ITAT&#039;s decision to annul the CIT&#039;s order for re-examination by the AO was upheld, with no substantial legal question identified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>