https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458441 The High Court condoned a 48-day delay in refiling the appeal, then held that the revenue's challenge to the Tribunal's order setting aside a service tax demand was not maintainable because questions of taxability, under binding precedent, are to be considered by the Supreme Court. As the appellant could not distinguish the earlier authorities relied on by the respondent, the appeal was dismissed, with liberty to the revenue to pursue appropriate remedies in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2025 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458441 The High Court condoned a 48-day delay in refiling the appeal, then held that the revenue's challenge to the Tribunal's order setting aside a service tax demand was not maintainable because questions of taxability, under binding precedent, are to be considered by the Supreme Court. As the appellant could not distinguish the earlier authorities relied on by the respondent, the appeal was dismissed, with liberty to the revenue to pursue appropriate remedies in accordance with law. Case-Laws GST Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458441