<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Not paid 1% of tax by Cash as per RULE 86B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119375</link>
    <description>Taxpayer failed to deposit the 1% cash component of output tax for February 2021 under Rule 86B; department issued a demand with interest. Subsequent excess cash deposit in May 2021 followed exhaustion of credit ledger balances. Forum advice is to contest the demand, relying on a high-court decision finding Rule 86B ultra vires, to seek relief and avoid creating adverse precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 12:28:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:40:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Not paid 1% of tax by Cash as per RULE 86B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119375</link>
      <description>Taxpayer failed to deposit the 1% cash component of output tax for February 2021 under Rule 86B; department issued a demand with interest. Subsequent excess cash deposit in May 2021 followed exhaustion of credit ledger balances. Forum advice is to contest the demand, relying on a high-court decision finding Rule 86B ultra vires, to seek relief and avoid creating adverse precedent.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 12:28:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>