<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 421 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458424</link>
    <description>Blacklisting was upheld where a supplier accepted a steel supply arrangement but failed to execute the contract or commence supply, and gave no reply to the show-cause notice. The order was found consistent with natural justice and not arbitrary, unwarranted, or irrelevant. The High Court&#039;s refusal to interfere under Article 226 was approved, and no ground was found for interference under Article 136.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 10:54:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 421 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458424</link>
      <description>Blacklisting was upheld where a supplier accepted a steel supply arrangement but failed to execute the contract or commence supply, and gave no reply to the show-cause notice. The order was found consistent with natural justice and not arbitrary, unwarranted, or irrelevant. The High Court&#039;s refusal to interfere under Article 226 was approved, and no ground was found for interference under Article 136.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>