<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeals by Airports Regulator Against Telecom Tribunal Orders Deemed Maintainable Under AERA Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82595</link>
    <description>This case deals with the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) against orders of the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) u/s 31 of the AERA Act. The key points are: AERA has a statutory duty to regulate tariffs for aeronautical services, considering various factors to ensure economically viable airports without compromising public interest. As AERA is interested in preserving public interest concerns animating the statute, it is a necessary party in appeals against its tariff orders before TDSAT. While judicial/quasi-judicial authorities are generally not impleaded as respondents in appeals against their orders, this principle is not absolute. The evolution of the fairne.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 08:15:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 08:15:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeals by Airports Regulator Against Telecom Tribunal Orders Deemed Maintainable Under AERA Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82595</link>
      <description>This case deals with the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) against orders of the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) u/s 31 of the AERA Act. The key points are: AERA has a statutory duty to regulate tariffs for aeronautical services, considering various factors to ensure economically viable airports without compromising public interest. As AERA is interested in preserving public interest concerns animating the statute, it is a necessary party in appeals against its tariff orders before TDSAT. While judicial/quasi-judicial authorities are generally not impleaded as respondents in appeals against their orders, this principle is not absolute. The evolution of the fairne.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 08:15:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>