https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760730 The SC held that a suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession filed in 1991 was not time-barred. The plaintiff's gift deed from 1983 was validly executed and could not be revoked without a reserved right to revoke. The trial court erroneously dismissed the suit as barred by limitation, applying the three-year period from the 1987 revocation deed. The SC ruled that since the primary relief sought was recovery of possession based on title, the 12-year limitation period under Article 65 of the Limitation Act applied, not the three-year period under Article 58 for mere declaration. The appeal was dismissed. en-us Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Oct 2024 08:15:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760730 The SC held that a suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession filed in 1991 was not time-barred. The plaintiff's gift deed from 1983 was validly executed and could not be revoked without a reserved right to revoke. The trial court erroneously dismissed the suit as barred by limitation, applying the three-year period from the 1987 revocation deed. The SC ruled that since the primary relief sought was recovery of possession based on title, the 12-year limitation period under Article 65 of the Limitation Act applied, not the three-year period under Article 58 for mere declaration. The appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760730