<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1349 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760750</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal by determining that the appellant is not liable to discharge service tax on ocean freight under the reverse charge mechanism. The Tribunal relied on the Gujarat HC&#039;s ruling in SAL Steel Ltd, which deemed taxing ocean freight as ultra vires, confirming that such services rendered outside India cannot be taxed under the Finance Act, 1994. The judgment was pronounced on 24th October 2024.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 08:15:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1349 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760750</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal by determining that the appellant is not liable to discharge service tax on ocean freight under the reverse charge mechanism. The Tribunal relied on the Gujarat HC&#039;s ruling in SAL Steel Ltd, which deemed taxing ocean freight as ultra vires, confirming that such services rendered outside India cannot be taxed under the Finance Act, 1994. The judgment was pronounced on 24th October 2024.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>