https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760752 In a PMLA prosecution, the Delhi HC held that prolonged pre-trial incarceration, absence of demonstrated flight risk or interference, and a trial not likely to conclude soon could justify regular bail despite Section 45 restrictions. The Court noted that the case against the applicants rested largely on Section 50 statements and one unsigned draft document, without any material showing that proceeds of crime reached their accounts or that they were beneficiaries of the alleged laundering. Applying the constitutional mandate of personal liberty and speedy trial under Article 21, the Court treated the statutory bail rigours as yielding to the facts of prolonged custody and delayed trial, and granted regular bail. en-us Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Oct 2024 08:15:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760752 In a PMLA prosecution, the Delhi HC held that prolonged pre-trial incarceration, absence of demonstrated flight risk or interference, and a trial not likely to conclude soon could justify regular bail despite Section 45 restrictions. The Court noted that the case against the applicants rested largely on Section 50 statements and one unsigned draft document, without any material showing that proceeds of crime reached their accounts or that they were beneficiaries of the alleged laundering. Applying the constitutional mandate of personal liberty and speedy trial under Article 21, the Court treated the statutory bail rigours as yielding to the facts of prolonged custody and delayed trial, and granted regular bail. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760752