<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1370 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760771</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the petition challenging the impugned orders under the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2018-19, citing a violation of natural justice principles. The orders dated 29.03.2022 and 17.03.2023, along with respective notices, were set aside. The matter was remitted back to the respondents for reconsideration from the issuance stage of the notice under Section 148A(b), with the petitioner granted the opportunity to respond, ensuring procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 08:15:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1370 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760771</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the petition challenging the impugned orders under the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2018-19, citing a violation of natural justice principles. The orders dated 29.03.2022 and 17.03.2023, along with respective notices, were set aside. The matter was remitted back to the respondents for reconsideration from the issuance stage of the notice under Section 148A(b), with the petitioner granted the opportunity to respond, ensuring procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>