<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1391 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760792</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the refund rejection orders, finding them in violation of Rule 92(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017, and principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded to the respondent for reconsideration, with instructions to provide a reasonable hearing opportunity and issue a reasoned order within four weeks. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 18:09:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1391 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760792</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the refund rejection orders, finding them in violation of Rule 92(3) of the CGST Rules, 2017, and principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded to the respondent for reconsideration, with instructions to provide a reasonable hearing opportunity and issue a reasoned order within four weeks. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>