https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458423 Challenge to validity of Clause 3.08(f) of the FTP 2015-20 alleging repugnancy with the parent FTDR Act and contesting the requirement of obtaining an Import Export Code; the High Court relied on an amendment to FTP 2015-20 in its approach. On consideration, SC declined to exercise jurisdiction under Article 136 and dismissed the special leave petition, leaving in place the impugned FTP provision and the IEC requirement as interpreted post-amendment. en-us Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jan 2026 14:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458423 Challenge to validity of Clause 3.08(f) of the FTP 2015-20 alleging repugnancy with the parent FTDR Act and contesting the requirement of obtaining an Import Export Code; the High Court relied on an amendment to FTP 2015-20 in its approach. On consideration, SC declined to exercise jurisdiction under Article 136 and dismissed the special leave petition, leaving in place the impugned FTP provision and the IEC requirement as interpreted post-amendment. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458423