<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1546 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458420</link>
    <description>Appeals falling below the tax-effect threshold in Circular No. 17 of 2019 may be disposed of without adjudication on merits, and the appeal here was treated as a low tax effect matter on that basis. If the Revenue later contends that such disposal was inappropriate, it may apply by application or praeceipe for restoration of the appeal for decision on merits. The Court also directed refund of court-fees in accordance with the applicable rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 20:09:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1546 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458420</link>
      <description>Appeals falling below the tax-effect threshold in Circular No. 17 of 2019 may be disposed of without adjudication on merits, and the appeal here was treated as a low tax effect matter on that basis. If the Revenue later contends that such disposal was inappropriate, it may apply by application or praeceipe for restoration of the appeal for decision on merits. The Court also directed refund of court-fees in accordance with the applicable rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>