<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (8) TMI 49 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39020</link>
    <description>The High Court of GAUHATI ruled in favor of the building contractor, holding that no profit element should be considered in the materials supplied by the M.E.S. department for construction works. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that net profit should be calculated based on net receipts without adding a percentage for the materials supplied. The judgment aligned with precedents from the Madras and Kerala High Courts, rejecting the department&#039;s argument supported by the Punjab and Haryana High Court decision. Judges D. PATHAK and M. C. PATHAK concurred with the decision, resolving the issue in favor of the assessee without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:40:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (8) TMI 49 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39020</link>
      <description>The High Court of GAUHATI ruled in favor of the building contractor, holding that no profit element should be considered in the materials supplied by the M.E.S. department for construction works. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that net profit should be calculated based on net receipts without adding a percentage for the materials supplied. The judgment aligned with precedents from the Madras and Kerala High Courts, rejecting the department&#039;s argument supported by the Punjab and Haryana High Court decision. Judges D. PATHAK and M. C. PATHAK concurred with the decision, resolving the issue in favor of the assessee without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>