SUPERVISOR WILL NOT COME UNDER THE DEFINITION OF ‘WORKMAN’ UNDER SECTION 2(s) OF THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947

SUPERVISOR WILL NOT COME UNDER THE DEFINITION OF ‘WORKMAN’ UNDER SECTION 2(s) OF THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13052 Characterization as a workman depends on the principal nature of duties and applicable salary threshold; supervisory duties and administrative appointments supported exclusion from the statutory workman definition. The employer's payment in lieu of notice, accepted and encashed by the employee, negated procedural irregularity in termination and justified setting aside tribunal-ordered reinstatement and back wages. en-us Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:19:56 +0530 Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:19:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator SUPERVISOR WILL NOT COME UNDER THE DEFINITION OF ‘WORKMAN’ UNDER SECTION 2(s) OF THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13052 Characterization as a workman depends on the principal nature of duties and applicable salary threshold; supervisory duties and administrative appointments supported exclusion from the statutory workman definition. The employer's payment in lieu of notice, accepted and encashed by the employee, negated procedural irregularity in termination and justified setting aside tribunal-ordered reinstatement and back wages. Articles Other Topics Fri, 25 Oct 2024 10:19:56 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13052