<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Income Recognition from Arbitral Award: Tribunal Upholds Taxpayer&#039;s Approach for 2019-20 Amid Legal Precedents.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82584</link>
    <description>The case pertains to the treatment of income received from an arbitral award in the assessment year. The AO passed an assessment order u/s 143(3) after the case was selected for scrutiny through CASS. The ITAT recorded that the AO issued a statutory notice u/s 142(1) with a specific query about the Nardana Claim-1 &amp; Nardana Claim-2, and the assessee filed a cogent reply. The AO&#039;s approach in accepting the assessee&#039;s explanation regarding the recognition of liability for Nardana Claim-1 &amp; Nardana Claim-2 as income in the AY 2018-19 was found sustainable. The amount was paid to the assessee in AY 2018-19 after furnishing a 100% bank guarantee on 100% margin, and it was rightly shown as a liability in the balance sheet. The income was shown in.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:10:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:10:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Income Recognition from Arbitral Award: Tribunal Upholds Taxpayer&#039;s Approach for 2019-20 Amid Legal Precedents.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82584</link>
      <description>The case pertains to the treatment of income received from an arbitral award in the assessment year. The AO passed an assessment order u/s 143(3) after the case was selected for scrutiny through CASS. The ITAT recorded that the AO issued a statutory notice u/s 142(1) with a specific query about the Nardana Claim-1 &amp; Nardana Claim-2, and the assessee filed a cogent reply. The AO&#039;s approach in accepting the assessee&#039;s explanation regarding the recognition of liability for Nardana Claim-1 &amp; Nardana Claim-2 as income in the AY 2018-19 was found sustainable. The amount was paid to the assessee in AY 2018-19 after furnishing a 100% bank guarantee on 100% margin, and it was rightly shown as a liability in the balance sheet. The income was shown in.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:10:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>