https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760665 The Delhi HC dismissed an appeal challenging a CESTAT order regarding alleged violations of CBLR 2018 by a customs broker. CESTAT found that the customs broker had met IEC holders personally, obtained required KYC documents, and the holders acknowledged the representative arrangement. The tribunal noted that regulations did not prohibit such consensual arrangements between IEC holders and their representative. Export documents were properly handed over and payments went to respective accounts. CESTAT concluded all importers had requisite documents, were legitimate entities, and the appellant gained no improper benefit from the arrangement. The HC upheld CESTAT's decision as based on sound reasoning and proper legal application. en-us Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:10:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760665 The Delhi HC dismissed an appeal challenging a CESTAT order regarding alleged violations of CBLR 2018 by a customs broker. CESTAT found that the customs broker had met IEC holders personally, obtained required KYC documents, and the holders acknowledged the representative arrangement. The tribunal noted that regulations did not prohibit such consensual arrangements between IEC holders and their representative. Export documents were properly handed over and payments went to respective accounts. CESTAT concluded all importers had requisite documents, were legitimate entities, and the appellant gained no improper benefit from the arrangement. The HC upheld CESTAT's decision as based on sound reasoning and proper legal application. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760665