<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1266 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760667</link>
    <description>The High Court held that administrative difficulties could not justify leaving a Bill of Entry unprocessed. While it declined to direct the exercise of statutory powers in any particular manner, it required the respondents to process the Bill of Entry expeditiously, on its own merits and in accordance with law. The Court therefore ensured that the matter was not left in a state of inaction and fixed a four-week outer limit for processing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:10:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1266 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760667</link>
      <description>The High Court held that administrative difficulties could not justify leaving a Bill of Entry unprocessed. While it declined to direct the exercise of statutory powers in any particular manner, it required the respondents to process the Bill of Entry expeditiously, on its own merits and in accordance with law. The Court therefore ensured that the matter was not left in a state of inaction and fixed a four-week outer limit for processing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>