<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (4) TMI 38 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39013</link>
    <description>A loan advanced in the course of the assessee&#039;s business and later settled by transfer of shares gave rise, on the facts found, to a shortfall that was treated as a business loss because the advance was intimately connected with the business. The question whether the amount also qualified as a bad debt was unnecessary to decide once business loss treatment was accepted. The amount was therefore allowable as a business loss, with the result favouring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:21:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (4) TMI 38 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39013</link>
      <description>A loan advanced in the course of the assessee&#039;s business and later settled by transfer of shares gave rise, on the facts found, to a shortfall that was treated as a business loss because the advance was intimately connected with the business. The question whether the amount also qualified as a bad debt was unnecessary to decide once business loss treatment was accepted. The amount was therefore allowable as a business loss, with the result favouring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>