<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1279 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760680</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the ITAT&#039;s decision to levy a penalty under Section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act. The Court concluded that the appellant failed to meet the requirements for penalty exemption, as they did not specify and substantiate the manner of deriving undisclosed income during the search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:10:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1279 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760680</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the ITAT&#039;s decision to levy a penalty under Section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act. The Court concluded that the appellant failed to meet the requirements for penalty exemption, as they did not specify and substantiate the manner of deriving undisclosed income during the search.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>