<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1287 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760688</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, dismissing the Income Tax Appeal. It clarified the interpretation of Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, supporting the respondent&#039;s recognition of contingent liabilities and income from an arbitral award. The Court found no substantial questions of law in the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the respondent&#039;s compliance with legal principles and ICDS VII regarding Government Grant income recognition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1287 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760688</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, dismissing the Income Tax Appeal. It clarified the interpretation of Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, supporting the respondent&#039;s recognition of contingent liabilities and income from an arbitral award. The Court found no substantial questions of law in the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the respondent&#039;s compliance with legal principles and ICDS VII regarding Government Grant income recognition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>