<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1303 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760704</link>
    <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging tax orders. Found respondents violated natural justice by not providing physical hearing notice. Ordered first respondent to issue fresh notice, conduct personal hearing, and pass appropriate orders within 3 months. Lifted bank account attachment, subject to petitioner paying Rs. 5,000 for procedural delay. Disposed of petition without additional costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 18:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1303 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760704</link>
      <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging tax orders. Found respondents violated natural justice by not providing physical hearing notice. Ordered first respondent to issue fresh notice, conduct personal hearing, and pass appropriate orders within 3 months. Lifted bank account attachment, subject to petitioner paying Rs. 5,000 for procedural delay. Disposed of petition without additional costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>