<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1314 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760715</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax evasion order, finding alternate remedy available under Section 107 of CGST Act. Court held petitioner must first exhaust statutory appeal mechanism before seeking writ relief. Directed prompt consideration of potential appeal while emphasizing discretionary nature of Article 226 constitutional jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1314 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760715</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax evasion order, finding alternate remedy available under Section 107 of CGST Act. Court held petitioner must first exhaust statutory appeal mechanism before seeking writ relief. Directed prompt consideration of potential appeal while emphasizing discretionary nature of Article 226 constitutional jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>