https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760716 Attachment of a bank account under the CGST Act was challenged on the ground that the petitioner was neither the taxable person nor covered by Section 122(1A), and that objections in Form GST DRC-22A were still pending. Given the pendency of those objections, the Court directed the competent authority to consider and decide the representation after granting an opportunity of hearing within four weeks. en-us Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760716 Attachment of a bank account under the CGST Act was challenged on the ground that the petitioner was neither the taxable person nor covered by Section 122(1A), and that objections in Form GST DRC-22A were still pending. Given the pendency of those objections, the Court directed the competent authority to consider and decide the representation after granting an opportunity of hearing within four weeks. Case-Laws GST Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760716