https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760718 The HC held the cancellation of the petitioner's registration invalid because the impugned order assigned no reasons and showed no application of mind, violating Article 14 and principles of natural justice. The petition was allowed by way of remand: the adjudicating authority must accept the petitioner's reply to the show-cause notice within four weeks, grant a hearing, and pass a reasoned, speaking order de novo. Doctrine of merger was held inapplicable where no reasons were given. en-us Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Oct 2025 18:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760718 The HC held the cancellation of the petitioner's registration invalid because the impugned order assigned no reasons and showed no application of mind, violating Article 14 and principles of natural justice. The petition was allowed by way of remand: the adjudicating authority must accept the petitioner's reply to the show-cause notice within four weeks, grant a hearing, and pass a reasoned, speaking order de novo. Doctrine of merger was held inapplicable where no reasons were given. Case-Laws GST Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760718