<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1318 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760719</link>
    <description>HC ruled on a CGST refund petition under Rule 92(3), finding procedural deficiencies in the Respondents&#039; rejection of the Petitioner&#039;s refund claim. The court set aside the denial orders, directing Respondents to provide proper hearing, comply with procedural requirements, and reconsider the refund application in accordance with legal provisions. The matter was restored for fresh disposal without prejudice to any contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1318 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760719</link>
      <description>HC ruled on a CGST refund petition under Rule 92(3), finding procedural deficiencies in the Respondents&#039; rejection of the Petitioner&#039;s refund claim. The court set aside the denial orders, directing Respondents to provide proper hearing, comply with procedural requirements, and reconsider the refund application in accordance with legal provisions. The matter was restored for fresh disposal without prejudice to any contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>