https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458384 The court restored a dismissed petition to its original status. It dismissed a Section 482 Cr.PC petition challenging the substitution of ISARC as the complainant in a cheque dishonor case, affirming ISARC's rights as assignee under the SARFAESI Act. The court upheld ISARC's authority to continue proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act, dismissing the petitioners' arguments as lacking merit. en-us Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:42:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458384 The court restored a dismissed petition to its original status. It dismissed a Section 482 Cr.PC petition challenging the substitution of ISARC as the complainant in a cheque dishonor case, affirming ISARC's rights as assignee under the SARFAESI Act. The court upheld ISARC's authority to continue proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act, dismissing the petitioners' arguments as lacking merit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458384