https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458385 Bombay HC allowed arbitration petitions challenging dismissal of appeals against arbitral award on limitation grounds. The court held that petitioner had vested substantive right to file appeal before appeal bench under unamended bye-law when original arbitration proceedings were filed. Amendment extending appeal period from 15 to 30 days did not apply retrospectively to pending references. Appeal bench wrongly held it lacked power to condone delay under bye-law 274A. Court set aside appeal bench's impugned awards, restored appeals with condonation applications, and directed expeditious hearing on merits. en-us Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:42:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458385 Bombay HC allowed arbitration petitions challenging dismissal of appeals against arbitral award on limitation grounds. The court held that petitioner had vested substantive right to file appeal before appeal bench under unamended bye-law when original arbitration proceedings were filed. Amendment extending appeal period from 15 to 30 days did not apply retrospectively to pending references. Appeal bench wrongly held it lacked power to condone delay under bye-law 274A. Court set aside appeal bench's impugned awards, restored appeals with condonation applications, and directed expeditious hearing on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458385