<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1538 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458402</link>
    <description>HC examined a case involving a transport contractor penalized for transporting a vehicle with an expired E Way Bill. Despite technical non-compliance, the court found the penalty disproportionate, noting no evidence of tax evasion. The HC directed tax authorities to reconsider the penalty amount, emphasizing procedural fairness and proportionality in penalty imposition under IGST/CGST Act, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1538 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458402</link>
      <description>HC examined a case involving a transport contractor penalized for transporting a vehicle with an expired E Way Bill. Despite technical non-compliance, the court found the penalty disproportionate, noting no evidence of tax evasion. The HC directed tax authorities to reconsider the penalty amount, emphasizing procedural fairness and proportionality in penalty imposition under IGST/CGST Act, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>