<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 942 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458381</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the winding-up petition, determining the alleged debt was a bona fide disputed debt rather than an admitted one. The petitioner failed to prove entitlement to fees under the agreement or that the respondent company received private equity finance as claimed. The court emphasized that winding-up proceedings should not enforce disputed debts, affirming the respondent company&#039;s solvency and status as a going concern.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:31:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 942 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458381</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the winding-up petition, determining the alleged debt was a bona fide disputed debt rather than an admitted one. The petitioner failed to prove entitlement to fees under the agreement or that the respondent company received private equity finance as claimed. The court emphasized that winding-up proceedings should not enforce disputed debts, affirming the respondent company&#039;s solvency and status as a going concern.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>