<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (9) TMI 26 - ORISSA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38998</link>
    <description>The High Court of Orissa addressed whether the penalty calculation should be based on a revised return filed after the Income-tax Officer discovered additional income. The Court held that the Tribunal erred in solely relying on the revised return for penalty calculation, as the assessee&#039;s actions indicated an intention to conceal income. Emphasizing the importance of voluntary revised returns before detection of suppression, the Court ruled that the penalty should be computed based on the total assessed figure minus the originally reported amount. The Court did not award costs for the proceedings. Judge N. K. Das concurred with the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:12:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (9) TMI 26 - ORISSA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38998</link>
      <description>The High Court of Orissa addressed whether the penalty calculation should be based on a revised return filed after the Income-tax Officer discovered additional income. The Court held that the Tribunal erred in solely relying on the revised return for penalty calculation, as the assessee&#039;s actions indicated an intention to conceal income. Emphasizing the importance of voluntary revised returns before detection of suppression, the Court ruled that the penalty should be computed based on the total assessed figure minus the originally reported amount. The Court did not award costs for the proceedings. Judge N. K. Das concurred with the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>