<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty for Expired E-way Bill Reduced; No Tax Evasion Intent Found, Rs. 10,000 Fine Imposed Instead of Maximum Penalty.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82548</link>
    <description>Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting goods without revalidating e-way bill. However, once plausible explanation provided by transporter/assessee and no attempt to evade tax found, proceedings should not culminate in maximum penalty u/s 129. Officer should have imposed penalty u/s 122(1)(xiv) only. Provisions of Section 129 do not authorize imposition of tax/penalty u/s 129(1)(a) or 129(1)(b) in cases of minor discrepancies; such penalty can be imposed only for violations leading to tax evasion, intent to evade tax, or repeated violations. In other cases, penalties u/ss 122 and 126 to be imposed. In present case, penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s 122(1)(xiv) can be imposed. On payment of penalty, bank guarantee to be released.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 08:15:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 08:15:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty for Expired E-way Bill Reduced; No Tax Evasion Intent Found, Rs. 10,000 Fine Imposed Instead of Maximum Penalty.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82548</link>
      <description>Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting goods without revalidating e-way bill. However, once plausible explanation provided by transporter/assessee and no attempt to evade tax found, proceedings should not culminate in maximum penalty u/s 129. Officer should have imposed penalty u/s 122(1)(xiv) only. Provisions of Section 129 do not authorize imposition of tax/penalty u/s 129(1)(a) or 129(1)(b) in cases of minor discrepancies; such penalty can be imposed only for violations leading to tax evasion, intent to evade tax, or repeated violations. In other cases, penalties u/ss 122 and 126 to be imposed. In present case, penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s 122(1)(xiv) can be imposed. On payment of penalty, bank guarantee to be released.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 08:15:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>