<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1176 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760577</link>
    <description>A special settlement statute operating as a self-contained code cannot be expanded by importing powers from the MVAT Act unless the statute expressly permits it, so settlement authorities may not use MVAT refund-adjustment powers to reopen or review settlement orders. Settlement dues must be computed year-wise under the statutory mechanism, and a refund from one financial year cannot be adjusted against liabilities for other years in separate settlement applications. Review under Section 15 requires a genuine error in the settlement order, prejudicial to revenue, supported by an existing refund-adjustment order; in the absence of any prior Section 50 order, review is not validly exercised and the review orders are unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 10:44:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1176 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760577</link>
      <description>A special settlement statute operating as a self-contained code cannot be expanded by importing powers from the MVAT Act unless the statute expressly permits it, so settlement authorities may not use MVAT refund-adjustment powers to reopen or review settlement orders. Settlement dues must be computed year-wise under the statutory mechanism, and a refund from one financial year cannot be adjusted against liabilities for other years in separate settlement applications. Review under Section 15 requires a genuine error in the settlement order, prejudicial to revenue, supported by an existing refund-adjustment order; in the absence of any prior Section 50 order, review is not validly exercised and the review orders are unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>