<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1209 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760610</link>
    <description>Rental receipts from properties held and let as the assessee&#039;s principal business activity were taxable as business income, because the character of the income followed the business object and operation of the assessee. Where letting out properties was itself the main business and the entire income arose from that activity, the house property head did not apply; the East India Housing principle was confined to cases where letting was incidental to another dominant object, while the Chennai Properties approach applied here. The consistent treatment of the same receipts as business income in earlier years was also followed, as no material change in facts was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1209 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760610</link>
      <description>Rental receipts from properties held and let as the assessee&#039;s principal business activity were taxable as business income, because the character of the income followed the business object and operation of the assessee. Where letting out properties was itself the main business and the entire income arose from that activity, the house property head did not apply; the East India Housing principle was confined to cases where letting was incidental to another dominant object, while the Chennai Properties approach applied here. The consistent treatment of the same receipts as business income in earlier years was also followed, as no material change in facts was shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>