<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1214 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760615</link>
    <description>HC Madras set aside tax demand order due to lack of proper notice. Petitioner claimed unawareness of proceedings as notices were only uploaded on GST portal. Court remanded matter for reconsideration, with petitioner agreeing to pay 10% of disputed tax. Respondent directed to provide opportunity to contest tax demand on merits. Garnishee order was set aside, writ petition disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 13:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1214 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760615</link>
      <description>HC Madras set aside tax demand order due to lack of proper notice. Petitioner claimed unawareness of proceedings as notices were only uploaded on GST portal. Court remanded matter for reconsideration, with petitioner agreeing to pay 10% of disputed tax. Respondent directed to provide opportunity to contest tax demand on merits. Garnishee order was set aside, writ petition disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>