https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760632 Challenge to detention under the CGST Act and initiation of confiscation proceedings focused on whether the Form GST MOV-10 notice and the Section 130 confiscation order should be interfered with at that stage, and whether provisional release of the goods and conveyance was justified. The petition raised jurisdictional objections to detention under Section 129 and to the confiscation process under Section 130, while also seeking interim release on terms comparable to connected matters. Notice was issued returnable on a specified date, and as an ad-interim arrangement the detained goods and conveyance were directed to be released on payment of the specified amount and furnishing of bond of the stated value. en-us Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 13:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760632 Challenge to detention under the CGST Act and initiation of confiscation proceedings focused on whether the Form GST MOV-10 notice and the Section 130 confiscation order should be interfered with at that stage, and whether provisional release of the goods and conveyance was justified. The petition raised jurisdictional objections to detention under Section 129 and to the confiscation process under Section 130, while also seeking interim release on terms comparable to connected matters. Notice was issued returnable on a specified date, and as an ad-interim arrangement the detained goods and conveyance were directed to be released on payment of the specified amount and furnishing of bond of the stated value. Case-Laws GST Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760632