https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760634 An assessment order was set aside because it failed to consider relevant material evidence, including purchase orders, tax invoices, weighment slips and bank statements, and dealt only with the e-way bills without explaining why the remaining documents were treated as fabricated. The High Court held that such non-consideration of material documents vitiated the order and required reconsideration. To balance revenue interests, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after the petitioner deposited 5% of the disputed tax demand and filed an additional reply. en-us Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 13:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760634 An assessment order was set aside because it failed to consider relevant material evidence, including purchase orders, tax invoices, weighment slips and bank statements, and dealt only with the e-way bills without explaining why the remaining documents were treated as fabricated. The High Court held that such non-consideration of material documents vitiated the order and required reconsideration. To balance revenue interests, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after the petitioner deposited 5% of the disputed tax demand and filed an additional reply. Case-Laws GST Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760634