<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1238 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760639</link>
    <description>The Rajasthan HC set aside dismissal of an appeal as time barred and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. It held that the appellate authority must first determine the actual date of filing and, if the delay is less than thirty days, give the appellant an opportunity to seek condonation. The Court interfered without examining the merits, leaving the appellate authority to decide the appeal afresh in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 18:56:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1238 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760639</link>
      <description>The Rajasthan HC set aside dismissal of an appeal as time barred and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. It held that the appellate authority must first determine the actual date of filing and, if the delay is less than thirty days, give the appellant an opportunity to seek condonation. The Court interfered without examining the merits, leaving the appellate authority to decide the appeal afresh in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>