<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1242 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760643</link>
    <description>Whether input tax credit (ITC) is allowable on goods/services used in construction of an immovable property leased for running a school: HC applied the Supreme Court&#039;s directive that classification depends on fact-specific functionality testing under Section 17(5)(d); the building must satisfy the legal definition of &quot;plant&quot; to permit ITC. Reasoning: factual inquiry required into functionality; HC remanded for adjudicatory determination. Outcome: petitioner failed to furnish requisite evidence before the adjudicating authority, did not challenge the final order here, and was denied relief; petition dismissed with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal and submit documents relying on the SC precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1242 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760643</link>
      <description>Whether input tax credit (ITC) is allowable on goods/services used in construction of an immovable property leased for running a school: HC applied the Supreme Court&#039;s directive that classification depends on fact-specific functionality testing under Section 17(5)(d); the building must satisfy the legal definition of &quot;plant&quot; to permit ITC. Reasoning: factual inquiry required into functionality; HC remanded for adjudicatory determination. Outcome: petitioner failed to furnish requisite evidence before the adjudicating authority, did not challenge the final order here, and was denied relief; petition dismissed with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal and submit documents relying on the SC precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>