https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458358 BIFR proceedings were treated as quasi-judicial, and an opportunity of hearing was implicit in the statutory scheme governing objections to a draft rehabilitation scheme. Where the matter continued on later dates, with written objections, agency comments, clarifications and a supplementary report all on record, a successor Bench could validly proceed and decide the matter if it applied its mind to the existing material and the CPC and BIFR Regulations disclosed no procedural bar. The challenge based on the rule that the person who hears must decide failed because the petitioners raised no timely objection and showed no prejudice. en-us Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:36:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458358 BIFR proceedings were treated as quasi-judicial, and an opportunity of hearing was implicit in the statutory scheme governing objections to a draft rehabilitation scheme. Where the matter continued on later dates, with written objections, agency comments, clarifications and a supplementary report all on record, a successor Bench could validly proceed and decide the matter if it applied its mind to the existing material and the CPC and BIFR Regulations disclosed no procedural bar. The challenge based on the rule that the person who hears must decide failed because the petitioners raised no timely objection and showed no prejudice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458358